Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. SHANTI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Shanti v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 897 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8324 (2 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. SHISHIR KUMAR,J

By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has approached this Court for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay post retiral dues including arrears of pension as well as regular pension to the petitioner month to month.  

Sri Chandan Sharma who appears for the respondents has filed a counter affidavit and the averments made in paras 13,14 and 15 which have been reproduced below, have been made that the petitioner has been paid retiral benefits to the tune of Rs.1,37,232/-, gratuity amount to the tune of Rs.1,11,408/- and arrears of pension from May 2006 to December 2006 amounting to Rs.25,824/- and the regular pension is being paid to the petitioner.  

"13. That in compliance to the aforesaid order the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur has also been paid retiral benefits of the petitioner amounting to Rs.1,37,232/-.

14. That the petitioner in compliance to orders passed in the aforesaid contempt application has been paid his gratuity (Rs.1,11,408=00) and arrears of pension from May 2006 to December 2006 amounting to Rs.25,824=00.  The aforesaid amount i.e. gratuity and arrears of pension has been paid to the petitioner vide Cheque No.505706 dated 04.01.2007 (Rs.1,37,232=00).

15. That in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to dismiss the aforesaid writ petition."

It has been submitted that the amount of leave encasement and group insurance are to be paid to the petitioner.  The relevant papers for the purpose have already been submitted to the competent authority and as soon as the same are received, the aforesaid amount will also be paid to the petitioner.  

In view of the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the respondents that the amount which are due to the petitioner may be paid, if possible, within a period of four months from today.

With the aforesaid observations the writ petition is disposed of.      

No order as to costs.

2.5.2007

V.Sri/-

W.P. No. 897 of 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.