Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AASIN versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Aasin v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21445 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 85 (3 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Aasin   indicted in case crime No. 14  of  2006 under sections 307, 504, 506  I.P.C. P.S. Saurikh  District Kannauj.

Heard Shri Neel Mani Sharma holding brief of Smt. Pratibha Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that according to the First Information Report applicant and co-accused including Brij Karan are said to have opened fire at the injured. The learned counsel urged that co-accused Brij Karan has been enlarged on bail by an order of this court  dated 23.11.2006 passed in criminal misc. bail application no. 21466  of 2006 and the case of the applicant is identical. The learned counsel argued that injured suffered single firearm injury whereas applicant and two co-accused persons are said to have opened fire at him. The learned counsel submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that role of opening fire has been assigned to the applicant and co-accused.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The First Information Report was registered in compliance of order passed under section 156(3) Cr.P.c. the injured was medically examined eleven days after the incident. The injured sustained single firearm injury whereas applicant and two co-accused persons are said to have opened fire. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Aasin   indicted in case crime No. 14  of  2006 under sections 307, 504, 506  I.P.C. P.S. Saurikh  District Kannauj , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/21445/06

3.1.2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.