MOHAMMAD HANIF & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Mohammad Hanif & Others v. State Of U.P. & Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 9861 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8559 (7 May 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

This application has been filed by the applicants Mohammad Hanif and others against the order dated 9.4.2007 passed by C.J.M. Ghaziabad in case No. 317 of 2007    whereby the Officer Incharge of the police station concerned has been directed to register the case and investigate the same under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.  

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the impugned order is illegal, it has not been passed in accordance with the provisions of law.

It has been rebutted by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that  there is no illegality in the impugned order because on the basis of the allegations made in the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a prima facie cognizable offence is made out and the allegations are of such nature which requires investigation. There is no illegality in the impugned order.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. and from the perusal of the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C., it appears that on the basis of the allegation made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out and the allegations are of such a nature which requires investigation, the impugned order  is not suffering from any illegality or irregularity, therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.

It is further contended that the applicants are men of peace loving. They shall cooperate with the investigation. In case, the applicants are  arrested and sent to jail during investigation, the applicants shall suffer irreparable loss.  Therefore, the applicants may not be arrested during investigation.

Considering the facts,  circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A, it is directed that the applicants shall not be arrested during investigation of  the case registered in pursuance of the impugned order but the applicants shall cooperate with the investigation.

With this direction this application is finally disposed of.

7.5.2007

RPD/9861/07

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.