Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SABIR HUSSAIN & ANR versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS

Supreme Court Cases

1996 SCC (1) 626 1995 SCALE (6)777

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SABIR HUSSAIN & ANR V. STATE OF U.P. & ORS [1995] RD-SC 768 (30 November 1995)

RAMASWAMY, K.

RAMASWAMY, K.

MAJMUDAR S.B. (J)

CITATION: 1996 SCC (1) 626 1995 SCALE (6)777

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3488 OF 1979 Virendra Singh V State of U.P. & Ors.

O R D E R Though the case has been called twice, the appellants are not present in person. We have taken the assistance of Shri K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the State.

The controversy raised in this case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Ramesh Chand v. State of U.P.

[(1980) 1 SCR 498] where this Court had held that "failure to specify number of services would not invalidate the draft scheme under Section 68 C or the approved scheme under Section 68D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939". Same is the question in these appeals also. Under these circumstances, the omission to specify the number of services in the approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved.

The appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances without costs.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.