Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NITIN SINGH versus PRABHAGIYA BANANDHIKARI MIRZAPUR & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Nitin Singh v. Prabhagiya Banandhikari Mirzapur & Others - WRIT - C No. 11816 of 2002 [2007] RD-AH 8920 (10 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. R.P. MISRA,I.

HON. SHISHIR KUMAR, J

We have heard Sri S.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Alok Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner by means of the present writ petition has approached  this Court for quashing the impugned order dated 10.12.2001 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition) by which no objection certificate for mining lease has been refused by the Forest Department on the ground that lease in question existed only 70 metres  away from the territory of forest.

The petitioner has annexed  order dated 19.7.2001 (Annexure 3 to the writ petition)  by which other persons have been  granted mining lease over the land which was 100 metres away from the forest land.  It was a question of fact to be decided on spot whether the area of mining lease granted in favour of the petitioner is within 100 metres from the forest area or not.

On 21.12.2006, taken into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances we appointed Smt.Sarita Singh as Advocate Commissioner to visit on spot and to submit a report.  Smt. Sarita Singh  vistited the spot on 26.12.2006 and has given a report that mining area of the petitioner is more than 110 metres  from all corners from the boundary of the forest department.  The report of the Commissioner is on record.      

In view of the aforesaid fact and in view of the fact stated in the Commissioner's report the order dated 10.12.2001 is liable to be  quashed. The writ petition is allowed. The respondent no.1 i.e. Prabhagiya Vanadhikari, Mirzapur Van Vibhag, Mirzapur is directed to issue no objection certificate in favour of the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of filing of the certified copy of the order.    

 No order as to costs.

10.5.2007

SKD

W.P.No.11816/2002


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.