Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RANJU KHARWAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ranju Kharwar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 22009 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8938 (10 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner.

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful work of the petitioner on the post of Anganwari worker.  The petitioner's case in the writ petition is that  she was appointed as Anganwari worker on 2.7.2004 and thereafter she is working. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner heard a rumour that Bal Vikas Pariyojana Adhikari  is interested  to terminate the petitioner.  He further contends that certain manipulations have been done in the date of birth in the High School  certificate of the petitioner. The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 9.4.2007 Annexure-6 to the writ petition. The prayer of the petitioner for issuing mandamus not to interfere  in the working of the petitioner has been pressed only on the basis of apprehension.  No order has been passed against the petitioner  affecting her working or status in so far as the representation of the petitioner  regarding certain interpolation in the date of birth in High School  certificate, as and when same issue is raised it is always open for the petitioner to submit reply.  The respondents have not  initiated any action against the petitioner.  Without there being  any cause of action the relief claimed by the petitioner in the writ petition cannot be granted.  However, it is made clear that as and when notice is issued to the petitioner it will be open for the petitioner to submit detailed reply which will be considered in accordance with law.  

D/-10.5.2007

SCS/22009


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.