Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BAHADUR SIHGH NARODA & ORS versus STATE OF M.P. & ORS

Supreme Court Cases

JT 1995 (9) 67 1995 SCALE (7)200

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BAHADUR SIHGH NARODA & ORS V. STATE OF M.P. & ORS [1995] RD-SC 808 (7 December 1995)

RAMASWAMY, K.

RAMASWAMY, K.

HANSARIA B.L. (J)

CITATION: JT 1995 (9) 67 1995 SCALE (7)200

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

O R D E R Leave granted.

After notice was issued confining to the question as to "why the petitioners may not be continued till the regularly selected candidates are appointed and taken charge", counter-affidavit has been filed by one C.L.

Khanna, Deputy D.S.E. in the office of the Joint Director, Public Instructions, Bhopal Division, Bhopal (M.P). It is stated therein that the regularly selected candidates have alreaby been appointed and taken charge, vide Annexure R. In that Annexure, the respective dates on which the selected candidates have taken charge have been given.

Under these circumstances, the limited relief for which notice was issued cannot be granted. The appeals are dismissed.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.