Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BRIKESH KUMAR YADAV versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Brikesh Kumar Yadav v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 24171 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 9741 (22 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for mandamus directing the respondents to treat a post of Driver duly sanctioned for District Institute of Education & Training, Mau and to permit the petitioner to function as such and to pay the petitioner his regular monthly salary. The petitioner's engagement  was on contract basis in pursuance of the post creation  which was initial upto 31.3.2005.  Subsequently the scheme was extended  till 31.3.2006 and till that date the petitioner continued to work.  The prayer of the petitioner  that the post of Driver be treated  duly sanctioned for  District Institute of Education & Training which cannot be granted by this Court . The power for creation of the post  is with the State Government and no direction can be issued by this Court in this case.  Further, the prayer of the petitioner to continue on the post, also cannot be granted .  It is  however, observed that  if any Scheme is continued or in any other Scheme if contract appointment is implemented by the respondents  it will be open for the respondents to make the application   for consideration on the basis of  his experience  of working on contract basis in the District Institute of Education & Training.  The said application may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

With the above observation the writ petition is dismissed.

D/-22.5.2007

SCS/24171


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.