Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF BIHAR A ORS versus MAHANTH BALRAM DAS

Supreme Court Cases

1996 SCALE (4)411

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE OF BIHAR A ORS V. MAHANTH BALRAM DAS [1996] RD-SC 591 (22 April 1996)

RAMASWAMY, K.

RAMASWAMY, K.

G.B. PATTANAIK (J)

CITATION: 1996 SCALE (4)411

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

O R D E R Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel for both the parties.

Proceedings were initiated under Section 10 of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XII of 1962) (for short, the 'Act'). The notification under Section 10(1) of the Act is required to be prepared by the Collector on the basis of the information obtained by the Collector regarding the land held under Sections 6, 8 and 9 or information had By the Collector under Section 7. The Collector shall cause a draft statement to be prepared issuing the particulars enumerated thereunder. The draft statement shall be published in the official Gazette of the district and such other place enumerated under rules. Objections received therein under sub-Section (3) are required to be disposed of. Under Section 11, he has to make the final publication of the draft statement in the manner prescribed thereunder.

Against the final statement, an appeal, revision or review etc. has been provided in the Act. In 1982, the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act was made. Under Section 32-A, the pending appeals, revision, review or reference other than those arising out of orders passed under Section 8 or sub- section (3) or sub-section (16) pending before any authority shall abate. Upon amendment, under the proviso thereunder, the Collector shall proceed with the case afresh in accordance with the provisions of Section 10. Similarly, Section 32-B also envisages fresh proceedings contemplated by Section 11 of the Act. It would thus be clear that, in spite of any matter having become final or matter pending by operation of Section 32-A and 32-8, all the proceedings stand abated. Consequently, the Collector has to prepare the draft statement required under Section 10 afresh and get it published as per law inviting objections from the land- holders and then proceed under sub-section (3) of Section

10. In view of this admitted legal position, the view taken by the High Court in C.W.J.C. No.8237/92 dated December 15, 1992 is not correct in law, The appeal is accordingly allowed. The order of the High Court is set aside. It would be open to the Collector to take action afresh in accordance with Section 10 and proceed with the matter according to law. No costs.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.