Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THE STATE OF GUJARAT versus GOPALBHAI BECHARBHAI

Supreme Court Cases

1996 SCALE (6)270

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THE STATE OF GUJARAT V. GOPALBHAI BECHARBHAI [1996] RD-SC 995 (21 August 1996)

RAMASWAMY, K.

RAMASWAMY, K.

G.B. PATTANAIK (J)

CITATION: 1996 SCALE (6)270

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1965-73 OF 1989 O R D E R These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment dated March 9, 1988 of the High Court of Gujarat in SCA No.5825/86 and batch directing the appellant to make a reference to the civil Court. The controversy is no longer res integra.

The admitted facts are that the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was passed on June 26, 1981. Notice under Section 12(2) was issued on September 18, 1981. After lapse of three years, an application came to be filed on July 30, 1985 seeking reference under Section 18.

The land Acquisition Officer (Deputy Collector) rejected the application on December 16, 1585. Challenging that order, the writ petition came to be filed. In view of the provisions in Section 18 (2) read with Section 31 of the Act, after the notice was received under Section 12(2) the claimants are required to file an application under Section 18 seeking reference within a period of 30 days from the date of the award when the claimants were present at the time of making the award either in person or through counsel or within six months from the date of the receipt of the notice. In view of the fact that notice was issued on September 18, 1981, the application should have been filed within six weeks from the date of the Collector's award when the person was present or was represented by the counsel before the Collector or six weeks from the date of the receipt of the notice under sub-section (2) of Section 12 or within six months from the date of the Collector's award, whichever period shall first expire. Since the application came to be filed a long, after about three years from the date of the award, the direction issued by the High Court is clearly illegal.

The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.