Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BALDEV RAJ TANEJA versus BIMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL (HUF) & ORS

Supreme Court Cases

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BALDEV RAJ TANEJA V. BIMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL (HUF) & ORS [2001] RD-SC 487 (14 September 2001)

D.P.Mohapatra & K.G.Balakrishnan

D E R This Special Leave Petition has been filed by the complainant against the revisional order dated 21st March, 1997 of the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal Revision No.194 of 1997 in which the learned single Judge (Justice S.K.Tiwari) while confirming the order of the learned Magistrate refusing to take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, observed that the learned Magistrate should have taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and set aside the order and directed the learned Magistrate to hold further enquiry into the complaint. The SLP is delayed by 1233 days. The inordinate delay in filing the SLP has not been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the SLP is dismissed on the ground of delay.

........................J.

(D.P.Mohapatra) ........................J.

(K.G.Balakrishnan) New Delhi;


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.