Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TARA CHAND versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


TARA CHAND v. UNION OF INDIA & Ors - CWP-598-2006 [2005] RD-P&H 267 (13 December 2005)

CWP NO.598 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.598 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 16.1.2006

Tara Chand ..Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and others ..Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

PRESENT: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has issued a legal notice dated 15.7.2005 (Annexure P4) claiming benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme for Central Government civil employees. It is, however, submitted that no decision has been taken on the claim raised by the petitioner through his aforestated legal notice dated 15.7.2005 (Annexure P4).

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner CWP NO.598 OF 2006 2

would be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of by requiring respondent No.2 i.e. the Development Commissioner, SSI, New Delhi, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.7.2005 (Annexure P4).

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.2 i.e. the Development Commissioner, SSI, New Delhi, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.7.2005 (Annexure P4)., by passing a well reasoned speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to the petitioner within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.N. Aggarwal)

January 16, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.