High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
NAHNU RAM v. SMT. BHALI DEVI & Ors - RSA-4571-2003  RD-P&H 291 (19 December 2005)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 4571 of 2003
DATE OF DECISION: January 16, 2006.
Smt. Bhali Devi and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Vikram Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant.
It is a family dispute. Appellant plaintiff filed a suit for declaration, wherein he laid challenge to the judgment and decree dated September 28, 1992, allegedly suffered by him. It is apparent from the records that the appellant of his own has admitted that the property in dispute was ancestral in nature. He has further admitted that his signatures were obtained on blank papers for the purpose of getting the said judgment and decree passed. However, there is nothing on record to show that any fraud was committed and the signatures were obtained on blank papers. Rather it is evident on record that he of his own appeared before the Court, filed written-statement and got recorded his statement before judgment and decree were passed. Both the Courts below have noticed a fact that now only at the instance of one of his sons, appellant is agitating the matter. No case is made out for interference in pure findings of fact. Dismissed.
January 16, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.