Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A. versus N.A.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


n.a. v. n.a. - CRM-61740-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10093 (8 November 2006)

Criminal Misc. No. 61740 M of 2006

Present : Mr. P.S.Hundal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. G.S.Bhandari, DAG Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3 Garish Kumar respondent No.4 is not present.

This is petition for issuance of directions not to harass the petitioners and their family.

According to the petitioners, they are more than 18 years of age and they had married of their own sweet will on 10.9.2006 but Garish Kumar, respondent No.4, who is father of Kiran Kumari, petitioner No.2, is not happy and police at his instance is harassing the petitioners and they apprehend danger to their life and security.

After hearing counsel for the petitioners, it is directed that let petitioners approach Senior Supdt. of Police, Kapurthala and S.H.O. Police Station, City Kapurthala if they still have any problem and then respondents i.e. Senior Supdt. Of Police, Kapurthala and S.H.O. Police Station, City Kapurthala shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and take appropriate action.

Disposed of.

November 16, 2006 (M.M.Aggarwal)

'ravinder' Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.