Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BALA versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bala v. State of Haryana - CRM-62095-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10094 (8 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.62095 -M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 14, 2006

Bala

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

...

Petitioner Bala has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.26 dated 28.4.2006 registered under Sections 304-B/498-A/34 IPC at Police Station Salhawas (Jhajjar).

I have heard the counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that at present the petitioner is at the advance stage of pregnancy. She is in custody since 1.5.2006.

Counsel further contends that the petitioner is married sister-in-law of the deceased. She was married more than 15 years ago and was living was her husband at Delhi. It is the case of the petitioner that she has nothing to do with the alleged demand of dowry and the alleged suicide committed by the deceased. Even in the alleged dying declaration, there is no allegation that at any point of time the petitioner demanded any dowry. Counsel contends that the brother-in-law of the deceased has already been granted regular bail and mother-in-law of the deceased is still in custody. The pregnancy of the petitioner of seven months has not been disputed by the State counsel. The trial is not going to conclude soon as till date no prosecution witness has been examined.

Keeping in view these facts, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner, and she is accordingly ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

November 14, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.