Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ATAM PARKASH versus PRINCIPAL/DIRECTOR, PUNJAB ENGINEERING C

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Atam Parkash v. Principal/Director, Punjab Engineering C - CWP-17810-CAT-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10155 (9 November 2006)

CWP NO.17810-CAT of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.17810-CAT of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 13.11.2006

Atam Parkash ....Petitioner

Versus

Principal/Director, Punjab Engineering College, and others ....Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND

PRESENT: Mr.H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

The petitioner is stated to have discharged duties in the office of the Chief Electoral Officer for the period from 9.1.1998 to 14.2.1998. This factual position has been acknowledged. Despite the aforesaid, the petitioner was denied both compensatory leave, as well as, honorarium. The claim of the petitioner is that he should be granted either of them. In order to claim either of the aforesaid benefits, the petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the `Tribunal') by filing Original Application No.252-CH of 2006. The same was dismissed by the Tribunal on 19.4.2006, by holding that the plea raised by the petitioner was barred by limitation stipulated in section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

We required learned counsel for the petitioner to explain to CWP NO.17810-CAT of 2006 2

us how he could overcome the determination rendered by the Tribunal.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, could not tender any explanation to wriggle out of the provisions of section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

In view of the above, we find no merit in the instant writ petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.D. Anand )

November 13, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.