Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANJIT SINGH & ORS. versus R.S. GUJRAL & ANR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manjit Singh & Ors. v. R.S. Gujral & anr. - COCP-269-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10242 (9 November 2006)

COCP No. 269 of 2006 -: 1 :-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP No. 269 of 2006

Date of decision: November 09, 2006.

Manjit Singh & Ors.

...Petitioner(s)

v.

R.S. Gujral & anr.

...Respondent(s)

Present: Shri Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri R.D. Sharma, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents.

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

The petitioners, along with some other candidates, filed CWP No.1302 of 2005, which was disposed of by this Court on September 16,, 2005 with a direction that the respondents shall consider their claim for appointment in the light of various judgments, which are referred to in the above stated order, within a period of three months.

Alleging non-compliance of the above stated order, this contempt petition has been filed.

In response to the show cause notice, an affidavit has been filed by Mr. Anand Sharma, Director, Elementary Education, Haryana and along with the said affidavit, he has also appended copies of the orders dated 5.6.2006 (Annexures R1 to R5) whereby the claim of the petitioners for appointment has been duly considered and turned down on the ground that COCP No. 269 of 2006 -: 2 :-

they are in the waiting list and candidates higher in merit than these petitioners are still awaiting appointments.

In this view of the matter, the directions issued by this court having been complied with, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to impugn the orders vide which their claim for appointment has been turned down, if so required and/or advised.

Disposed of.

Rule discharged.

November 09, 2006. [ Surya Kant ]

kadyan Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.