Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANITA SHARMA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anita Sharma v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-18000-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10627 (16 November 2006)

C.W.P. No. 18000 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 18000 of 2006

Date of Decision: November 16, 2006

Anita Sharma

.....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate

for the petitioner.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in the writ petition is for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated July 23, 2006 (P-8) as per law in the light of Asha Rani's case (CWP NO. 3906 of 2005) and the notification of the State Government based upon Satbir Singh's case i.e.

Civil Writ Petition No. 4382 of 2003 (P-9) and give the pay scale of RS.5450-8000 to the present petitioner as has been awarded to her C.W.P. No. 18000 of 2006 [2]

colleagues having same qualification and performing same duties in the education Department.

For the aforementioned relief claimed in the present writ petition, the petitioner has already got served a legal notice dated 23.7.2006 (P-8), upon the respondents.

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to him. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be meritorious and decided in her favour then the benefit accruing to the petitioner shall be given within a further period of two months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

November 16, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.