Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DALIP KAUR & ORS versus MOHINDER SINGH & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dalip Kaur & Ors v. Mohinder Singh & Ors - RSA-4840-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 1069 (22 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 4840 of 2004 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: March 3, 2006.

Parties Name

Dalip Kaur and others

...APPELLANTS

VERSUS

Mohinder Singh and others

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. J.S. Bhandohal,

Advocate, for the appellants.

JUDGMENT:

Appellants plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they have got an easementary right to pass through the land, description of which was given by them in their plaint. Their suit was dismissed. They also failed in appeal. Both the Courts below have found it, as a matter of fact, that earlier also the appellants Chand Singh and Naurang Singh filed a suit for permanent injunction, wherein it was stated that the passage in dispute was given to them, in exchange, by father of the respondents defendants. A specific issue was framed in that regard. Ultimately, after contest, their suit was dismissed. They also lost in appeal. It appears that subsequent thereto, appellants filed the present suit for the same relief, which was declined to them in their earlier suit. As the present suit was filed only by adding relief of declaration, the Courts below, by noticing earlier judgment, came to a conclusion that the present suit was barred by res judicata and further that the appellants have failed to prove, on record, existence of the passage, as claimed by them. This Court feels that in view of findings given by the appellate Court below, in paras No. 11 and 12 of the judgment, no case is made out for interference in pure findings of fact, as no substantial question of law has been raised. Dismissed.

March 03, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )

DKC Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.