Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JASPREET KAUR & ANR versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jaspreet Kaur & Anr v. The State of Punjab - CRM-52834-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10915 (21 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.52834-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 27, 2006

Jaspreet Kaur and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Punjab

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. P.S.Jahangir, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.P.S.Hundal, Advocate,

for the complainant.

...

The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.126 dated 27.7.2006 registered under Sections 406/420 IPC at Police Station Samrala, District Ludhiana, have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are unmarried brother and sister of Parminder Singh, who is the main accused and in whose account the payment was made. He further contends that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case because of their relationship with the said main accused. Counsel further contends that in terms of the interim order dated September 7, 2006/October 24, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. The factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners has not been disputed by the State counsel.

In view of the above, the interim order dated September 7, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Thereafter except for material change in the circumstances, the petitioners shall be entitled for the grant of regular bail by the trial Court on the terms and conditions to be imposed by the court.

Disposed of accordingly.

November 27, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.