Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURINDER KUMAR versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab - CRM-64686-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 10983 (21 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRL.M.No.64686-M of 2006

DATE OF ORDER: 29.11.2006

Surinder Kumar

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab

....Respondent(s)

CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*.

Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate.

Mr. G.S. Bhandari, DAG, Punjab.

M.M. AGGARWAL,J

This is petition for regular bail. Case is for the offence under Sections 399/402 IPC.

Petitioner was not arrested at the spot nor any recovery effected from him although he is named in the FIR.

Petitioner is stated to be in custody for the last two months.

Challan is stated to have been presented.

Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

November 29, 2006 ( M.M. AGGARWAL )

manoj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.