Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAMARJIT & ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Samarjit & Anr v. State of Haryana - CRM-74336-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11055 (22 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.74336-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 28, 2006

Samarjit and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

...

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in Execution application No.54 of 13.8.2005/1.4.2002 (Annexure P-1) as the Executing Court vide order dated 16.9.2006 had issued warrants of arrest.

After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

November 28, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.