Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHANKAR LAL versus PAWAN KUMAR JAIN

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shankar Lal v. Pawan Kumar Jain - CR-4458-2000 [2006] RD-P&H 11152 (23 November 2006)

C.R. No. 4458 of 2000 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANIDGARH.

DATE OF Decision: 13.9.2006

Shankar Lal ..Petitioner

Versus

Pawan Kumar Jain ..Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA
Present:- Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate

for the petitioner.

None for the respondent.

H.S.BHALLA, J.

It is crystal clear from the record that the Appellate Authority, Gurgaon dismissed the petition of the landlord on the ground that the eviction of the petitioner cannot be ordered under the provisions of the Rent Act and since it was found by the appellate authority that the demised premises is beyond the purview of the Rent Act, the order passed by the Rent Controller, Gurgaon was set aside. Aggrieved against the order dated 28.7.2000 passed by the appellate authority, the present petitioner has knocked the door of this Court.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the very outset, has placed on record copy of the notification dated October 18, 2001, which runs as under:-

" Haryana Government

Urban Development Department

(Committees)

Notification

The 18th

October, 2001

No. 15/21/97-2CI:- In exercise of the powers conferred by C.R. No. 4458 of 2000 2

Sub-section (1) and (6) of Section 3 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (Act 24 of 1973) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf and with reference to Haryana Government, Urban Development Department (Committees), notification No.15/21/97-2CI, dated the 6th

August, 2001, the Governor of

Haryana hereby declare the local area as mentioned in the Schedule given below to be a municipality in the name of Municipal Committee, Haily Mandi in District Gurgaon.

Schedule of Boundaries

As defined in the Haryana Government Notification No.15/21/97-2CI, dated 6th

August, 2001.

Chandigarh MANIK SONAWANE,

16.10.2001 Commissioner and Secretary to Government Haryana, Urban Development Department"

On the strength of this notification, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has prayed that the matter is liable to be remanded. As per the notification, the demised premises in question is under the Municipal Committee, Haily Mandi in District Gurgaon, and as such, is covered under the Rent Act.

Without going into the merits of the case and considering the fact that the area in question has been re-notified as an urban area, the present revision petition is allowed. The judgment dated 28.7.2000 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Gurgaon, is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Court of Appellate Authority Gurgaon, for a fresh decision. Keeping in view the fact that the matter pertains to the year 1993, the Appellate Authority, Gurgaon, is directed to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months.

Parties are directed to appear before the District Judge, C.R. No. 4458 of 2000 3

Gurgaon on 15.11.2006.

13.9.2006 ( H.S.BHALLA )

VK JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.