Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU RAM AND ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Babu Ram and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors. - CWP-19047-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11191 (23 November 2006)

C.W.P. No. 19047 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 19047 of 2006

Date of decision: 01.12. 2006

Babu Ram and Anr. .........Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and Ors. ...........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV

Present: Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate

for the petitioners

-.-

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J (Oral)

The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.11.2006 (Annexure P-2), by which their case, which was pending before respondentNo.2, has been ordered to be transferred to respondent No. 3- Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by virtue of the Notification dated 14.11.2006 (Annexure P-3), issued by the Government of Punjab, the Joint Development Commissioner (IRD), Punjab, is the competent authority to hear the cases relating to the Patiala Division, District Kapurthala and Nawanshahr.

It is contended that this case of the petitioners should, therefore, be transferred to respondent No. 5 instead of respondent No. 3.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. C.M. Munjal, Senior Additional C.W.P. No. 19047 of 2006 2

Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and he does dispute the fact that the cases relating to the Patiala Division, are to be heard by respondent No. 5.

In view of the above Notification, we set aside the order dated 15.11.2006 (Annexure P-2) and order that the case of the petitioners be transferred to respondent No. 5, who shall decide the same on merits.

Parties are directed to appear before respondent No. 5 on 08.01.2007.

Copy of the order be given dasti.

( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)

JUDGE

( NIRMAL YADAV)

JUDGE

December 01, 2006

mohan


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.