High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Sukh Bahadur v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited an - CWP-10807-2005  RD-P&H 11322 (27 November 2006)
C.W.P. No. 10807 of 2005
Date of Decision: 30.11.2006
Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Malik, Advocate,
for the respondents.
M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing termination order dated 12.3.2001 (P-1) and order dated 18.5.2005 (P-10) whereby claim of the petitioner and similarly situated persons for regularisation of service has been rejected. A further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service and regularise his services from the date of his entitlement alongwith all the arrears of C.W.P. No. 10807 of 2005
salary and allowances together with interest by following the principle of `equal pay for equal work'.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties we are of the considered view that no such directions could be issued for regularization of the services of the petitioner in view of the Constitution Bench judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, (2006) 4 SCC 1 as well as a detailed judgment of this Court in the case of Rajinder Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2006 (2) PLR 474.
Therefore, the instant petition fails and the same is dismissed.
November 30, 2006 JUDGE
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.