High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Dr.(Mrs.) Narinder Sandhu v. State of Haryana & Ors. - CWP-8527-2005  RD-P&H 11358 (28 November 2006)
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.
C.W.P.No.8527 OF 2005
Date of Decision:- 21.11.2006
Dr.(Mrs.) Narinder Sandhu ...Petitioner.
State of Haryana & Others. ...Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
Present: Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate for the
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG Haryana for the Respondents.
M.M.KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
The basic prayer of the petitioner in this petition is to grant her emergency benefits i.e. the benefit of service rendered by her in the Army. She has initially challenged the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965.
However, an amendment in the Rules dated 2.12.2004 (Annexure C.W.P.No.8527 of 2005 2
P7) has been relied upon to argue that the respondent Government has now recognized the whole Army service irrespective of the fact whether it was rendered during emergency or not.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the writ petition in order to enable him to file a detailed representation on account of the amendment dated 2.12.2004 (Annexure P7). There is no objection raised to the aforementioned course being adopted for the disposal of the writ petition by the learned State counsel.
In view of the above, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a detailed representation before the respondents within a period of one month from today.
The same shall be decided by the respondent within a period of three months from the date of its receipt by keeping in view the amendment dated 2.12.2004 (Annexure P7).
The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. A certified copy of the order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner, on payment of usual charges.
November 21, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.