Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JITENDER YADAV & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jitender Yadav & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-17251-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11359 (28 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 17251 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: December 01, 2006

Parties Name

Jitender Yadav and others

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

PRESENT: Mr. S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv., with Mr. Harminderjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. H.S. Hooda, A.G., Haryana, with

Mr. B.S. Rana, Addl. A.G., Haryana;

Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate, for respondent No.4 JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)

Order.

Affidavits of twelve Municipal Commissioners have been produced by counsel for the petitioners. Without going into the controversy, as to who is responsible, in not calling the meeting, we are of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of by directing that a meeting of the Municipal Corporation be called to consider no confidence motion against respondent No. 4. In view of the fact that as many as 12 affidavits have been filed by the Municipal Councilors, which number is sufficient to convene the meeting, (affidavits in original have been handed over to the Advocate General, Haryana), to which both the parties have failed to raise any cogent objection. Accordingly, we direct the Divisional Commissioner, Gurgaon, who is present in Court, to issue notice to all the Councilors and CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 17251 OF 2006

fix the meeting on December 22, 2006, to consider no confidence motion against respondent No. 4. At the time of meeting, the votes are allowed to be polled by way of secret ballot. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

( Pritam Pal )

December 01, 2006. Judge

DKC


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.