High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
M/s Sushil Kumar Sarvjeet Singh v. Harminder Singh - COCP-1194-2006  RD-P&H 1140 (23 February 2006)
CR No. 1194 of 2006
DATE OF DECISION:2.3.2006
M/s Sushil Kumar Sarvjeet Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR,
Present:- Mr.Gorakh Nath,Advocate
for the petitioner.
The instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is directing against the order dated 25.11.2005. The trial court has directed the defendant-petitioner Sushil Kumar and his clerk Mohinder Singh, working with the firm belonging to the defendant-petitioner to give their specimen signatures, so that the same may be compared with the signatures on the disputed receipt.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that no interference of this Court would be warranted, as the order does not suffer from any legal infirmity. The trial court is well within its right to obtain the signatures of the defendant-petitioner and the Clerk working with the firm. Accordingly, the petition fails and the same is dismissed.
March 2,2006 (M.M. KUMAR)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.