Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANTOSH BHATACHARYA & ANR versus HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIM

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mantosh Bhatacharya & Anr v. Haryana Power Generation Corporation Lim - CWP-18997-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11403 (28 November 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 18997 of 2006

Date of Decision: 01.12.2006

Mantosh Bhatacharya and another

...Petitioners

Versus

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited and others ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

The instant petition is directed against the order dated 4.2.2004 showing that respondent Nos. 4 to 11 have been given deemed date of promotion earlier to the date of promotion of the petitioners. On the basis of the aforementioned deemed date of promotion, a tentative seniority list showing the petitioners junior to respondent Nos. 4 to 11 has been circulated (P-5). The name of the petitioners in the tentative seniority list has been shown at Sr. Nos. 13 and 18 respectively whereas the names of respondent Nos. 4 to 11 C.W.P. No. 18997 of 2006

appears at Sr. Nos. 4, 5, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11 respectively. It is obvious that against the tentative seniority list objections have been invited and the petitioners are stated to have not filed any objection, which were required to be filed within one month from the date of issue of that letter. It is stated before us that the tentative seniority list has not been finalised as yet. If that be so then the petitioners may file objections against the tentative seniority list within two weeks from today and the same shall be considered in accordance with law by passing a reasoned speaking order by respondent No. 2.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

December 1, 2006

JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.