Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAGDISH CHANDER versus HOUSING BOARD HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jagdish Chander v. Housing Board Haryana & Ors - CWP-16410-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 11523 (30 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 16410 of 2005

Date of decision November 21, 2006

Jagdish Chander

.......Petitioner

Versus

Housing Board Haryana and others

........Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL AND
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA.

Present:- Sh. O.P.S. Tanwar, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Sh. Brijesh Aggarwal, Advocate

for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

****

The petitioner has challenged the order dated August 31, 2005 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Chief Revenue Officer-A, Housing Board, Haryana-respondent No.3 whereby the application of the petitioner for registration of EWS-1/EWS-II Ground floor, Sector 52 under HGE category, Gurgaon has been rejected on the ground that he was not eligible for the aforesaid category.

In the written statement filed by the respondents, the claim of the petitioner has been contested.

As a preliminary objection, it has been maintained by the respondents that a draw of lots of the plots had been held on September 9, 2005 and the registration amount of Rs.17,500/- was returned to the petitioner on September 22, 2005 through a cheque and the petitioner had withdrawn the aforesaid amount.

Without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and also without commenting upon the various pleas raised by the respondents, we find that since the draw of lots had already been held on September 9, 2005 whereas the present writ petition was filed by the petitioner on September 30, 2005 and had come up for motion hearing on October 7, 2005, the petitioner cannot claim any relief in the present petition.

The present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

However, we have no doubts that in case any new scheme is floated by the Housing Board Haryana-respondent No.1 in future and the petitioner so applies for registration under the scheme, the name of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law.

(VINEY MITTAL)

JUDGE

(H.S.BHALLA)

JUDGE

November 21, 2006

archana


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.