Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT.SANTOSH versus VIRENDER SINGH

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt.Santosh v. Virender Singh - CM-20352-CII-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11559 (30 November 2006)

C.M. No.20352-CII of 2006. {1}

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No.20352-CII of 2006.

Date of decision : 1.12.2006.

Smt.Santosh ........Petitioner

versus

Virender Singh .......Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA.
Present : Mr.Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Vijay Dahiya, Advocate for the respondent.

* * *

ORDER

HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has sought transfer of the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and pending in the Court of Shri Deepak Gupta, Additional District Judge, Sonepat, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak.

It has been pointed out that marriage between the parties was solemnized on 3.7.2002 at Rohtak. It is the case of the petitioner that she was maltreated at her matrimonial home and was given severe beatings by her husband and her in-laws on various occasions. The present petition for dissolution of marriage has been filed by the respondent as a counter blast to the legal recourse adopted by the petitioner under Section 97 of the Cr.P.C. and therefore, the petitioner has sought transfer of the petition pending at Sonepat to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without going into the merits of the allegations levelled in the petition, I deem it appropriate to transfer the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, titled as Virender Singh versus Smt.Santosh, from C.M. No.20352-CII of 2006. {2}

the Court of Sh.Deepak Gupta, learned Additional District Judge, Sonepat to the Court of learned District Judge, Rohtak. It shall be open to the learned District Judge, Rohtak to entrust the said petition to the court of competent jurisdiction.

Parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the Court of learned District judge, Rohtak on 22.12.2006, for further proceedings.

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

(HEMANT GUPTA)

December 1, 2006 JUDGE

*mohinder


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.