High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Rulda Singh v. Sucha Singh & Anr - RSA-846-2006  RD-P&H 1161 (27 February 2006)
RSA No.846 of 2006
Date of Decision: 2.03.2006
Sucha Singh and another
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri Deepak Arora-I, Advocate for the appellant JUDGMENT
Appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction with a prayer that the respondents-defendants be restrained from interfering in his possession over the property, in dispute. His suit was dismissed. He also failed in appeal. Both the Courts below have found it as a matter of fact that the appellant has failed to prove that he was in possession of the property, as alleged by him. The Courts below have noticed that except bald statement of the appellant, he has failed to produce any other evidence on record to prove his possession. Document Ex.P2 has been discarded on the ground that it did not prove possession of the appellant over the property, in dispute. Opinion arrived at by the Courts below is perfectly justified and is based upon proper appreciation of evidence on record. No substantial question of
law has been raised at the time of arguments, which may necessitate any interference.
March 02, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.