Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SALIM MOHAMMAD versus STATE OF HARYANA.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Salim Mohammad v. State of Haryana. - CRM-66266-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 11625 (30 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM NO.66266-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION.8.12.2006

Salim Mohammad ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana. ......Respondent

CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT Mr.Rajesh Chaudhary, Advocate

Ms. Ritu Punj , DAG, Haryana.

AJAI LAMBA , J( Oral )

This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for bail in a case lodged under Sections 376, 34 IPC.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent / State has pointed out that the petitioner has been declared a proclaimed offender.

No ground for bail is made out under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Petition is dismissed.

December 8,2006 ( AJAI LAMBA )

mamta JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.