High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Bipin Tripathi v. State of Haryana - CRM-52060-M-2006  RD-P&H 11756 (1 December 2006)
CRM NO.52060-M of 2006
DATE OF DECISION.12.12.2006
Bipin Tripathi ......Petitioner
State of Haryana ......Respondent
CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT Mr.Sunil Bindish, Advocate
Mr. Narender Sura, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Kaushik, Advocate for complainant.
AJAI LAMBA , J( Oral )
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for bail in a case lodged under Sections 498 A, 406 and 506 IPC.
The primary argument of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that initially proceedings were initiated in the jurisdiction of Delhi. On the intervention of the authorities, the dowry articles were returned.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent / State on instructions from ASI Jaswant Singh has pointed out that in-fact complaint made was in Delhi, however, same was not within the territorial jurisdiction and therefore, it was returned. Some dowry articles were recovered. The entire dowry and other gold articles are still with the petitioner and without custodial interrogation, recovery would be impossible.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the petitioner is husband, this petition is dismissed.
December12,2006 ( AJAI LAMBA )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.