Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

WAZIR SINGH & ANR. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Wazir Singh & anr. v. STATE OF HARYANA & Anr - CRM-10228-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 1195 (27 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRL.M.No.10228-M OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 1.3.2006

Wazir Singh & anr.

.....Petitioners

Vs.

State of Haryana

....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present : Mr.Narender Hooda, Advocate

Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Addl.A.G., Haryana

Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate

...

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that his clients give an undertaking to the Court that, without prejudice to their rights and contentions and purely by way of ad hoc arrangement, they have paid a sum of Rs.50,000/- by way of bank draft and they will pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month w.e.f. 1.3.2006, payable by 10th of every month, towards the

claims of the complainant for herself and the child and the complainant has received the amount and will receive future amounts without prejudice to her rights and contentions during pending proceedings.

It is also pointed out that the complainant is pregnant and after birth of the child, the petitioners will pay an additional amount of Rs.1,000/- per month.

Learned counsel for the petitioners also says that the petitioners will continue to make efforts for settlement and in these circumstances arrest of the petitioners is not called for.

Child has also been handed over to the complainant.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case and without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the case, petitioners are granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or for three months whichever is later during which the petitioners will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.

In the event of arrest, petitioners will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that they will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; they will not interfere with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly; they will not leave the country without the previous permission of the court; they will associate with the investigation as and when called by the police and they will surrender passports, if any.

The petition is disposed of.

1.3.2006 (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)

JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.