High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
KHUSHKARAN SINGH & Anr v. STATE OF HARYANA - CRM-10812-m-2006  RD-P&H 1216 (28 February 2006)
CRL. MISC. NO. 10812-M OF 2006
DATE OF DECISION: 09.03.2006
KHUSHKARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr S.S. Rangi, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana.
On 23.2.2006, the following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners are willing to rehabilitate the complainant and will put her to notice about proceedings in this Court and about proposal for rehabilitation.
Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana, for 9.3.2006." Counsel for the petitioner says that efforts for settling the complainant are being made
Counsel for the State says that since no case is registered against the petitioners, their custody is not required at this stage.
In view of above stand, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
However, if the petitioners are to be arrested in connection with the matrimonial dispute, they will be given advance notice of one week, so that they may take steps to rehabilitate the complainant or take their remedies, if rehabilitation is not possible, in accordance with law. This order will be operative for a period of one year from today.
March 09, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.