Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MEHANDI KHAN versus STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH & ANR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mehandi Khan v. State of U.T., Chandigarh & Anr. - CRM-16080-M-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 12175 (7 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.16080-M of 2004

DATE OF DECISION:12.12.2006

Mehandi Khan ..........Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T., Chandigarh & Anr. ..........Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- None for the petitioner.

Shri Rajiv Sharma, Standing Counsel

for U.T., Chandigarh.

****

On November 3, 2006, no was present on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

December 12, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.