High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
KARNAIL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB - CRM-11522-m-2006  RD-P&H 1220 (28 February 2006)
CRL. MISC. NO. 11522-M OF 2006
DATE OF DECISION: 06.03.2006
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Ms Jyoti Choudhary, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms Reeta Kohli, DAG, Punjab.
Offence alleged is under sections 324/341/326 IPC.
Counsel for the State says that custody of the petitioner is not required, but the petitioner should join investigation.
Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioner will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that the petitioner will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; he will not interfere with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly; he will not leave the country without the previous permission of the court; he will associate with the investigation as and when called by the police and that he will surrender the passport, if any.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
March 06, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.