Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

POONAM SHARMA versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Poonam Sharma v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-18978-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12294 (8 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.18978 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 2006

Poonam Sharma

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

....

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri D.S.Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to respondent No.2, Amritsar Improvement Trust to execute the agreement in favour of the petitioner for the transfer of the plot bearing No.E/242, situated on the Ajnala Road Area Expansion Scheme, Amritsar, being a locally displaced person.

The petitioner in this regard relies upon a judgment of the Division Bench dated May 8,2006 passed in LPA No.751 of 1992 (Annexure P.11).

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the Improvement Trust, Amritsar, respondent No.2, appending all the relevant documents and also the copy of judgment Annexure P.11 within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner, then respondent No.2 Trust shall take a final decision thereupon within a further period of four months of the filing of the said representation, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further action, as may be required, in accordance with law.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

November 30, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.