Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ARVIND KUMAR AND OTHER versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PAN

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Arvind Kumar and other v. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Pan - CWP-19474-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12296 (8 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.19474 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: December 8, 2006

Arvind Kumar and other

....Petitioners

VERSUS

Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another ....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioners have approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to refund the amount paid by the petitioners, claimed to have been paid in excess by them, on account of compound interest on the outstanding dues with regard to the allotment of residential plots in various sectors of Urban Estate, Karnal.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we find that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have already issued a legal notice (Annexure P.4) dated August 2, 2006 which remains unresponded so far.

In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Estate Officer, HUDA, Karnal, respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the aforesaid legal notice (Annexure P.4) within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further action, as may be required, in accordance with law.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

December 8, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.