Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINIT KUMAR & ORS versus BABA FARID UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vinit Kumar & Ors v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences - CWP-19084-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12325 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.19084 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: December 4, 2006

Vinit Kumar and others

....Petitioners

VERSUS

Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot and others ....

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri M.S.Rakkar, Senior Advocate with Shri Pritam Singh Baath, Advocate for the petitioners.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

The petitioners claim that they are entitled to the grace marks with regard to the examination of 2nd professional BDS course,

which was held in May 2006 and in which the petitioners had obtained less marks than the qualifying marks. The petitioners claim that as per the regulations applicable to them, they are entitled to the aforesaid grace marks and are also entitled to complete their studies of the 3rd

professional course.

Shri M.S.Rakkar, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners states that since the petitioners have already filed detailed representations (Annexures P.2 and P.3) before the Vice Chancellor on which no action has been taken by the Vice Chancellor, therefore, the petitioners would be satisfied if the directions are issued to the Vice Chancellor, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences,

Faridkot, respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representations.

In view of the statement made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, but without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, we dispose of the present petition with a request to the Vice Chancellor, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot, respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the representations (Annexures P.2 and P.3) within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further appropriate action, as may be required, in accordance with law.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

December 4, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.