Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHAND SINGH & ORS versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Chand Singh & Ors v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-18419-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12335 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.18419 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: December 5, 2006

Chand Singh and others

....Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

....

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri R.K.Battas, Advocate for the petitioners.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

The petitioners have approached this Court making a grievance against the proceedings initiated by the State Government for converting some land into commercial and residential sites. It has been alleged by the petitioners that the aforesaid proposal includes their land as well and has been mooted only with a view to benefit M/s.Ansal Mittal Township Pvt. Ltd., respondent No.5. The petitioners have also challenged the communication dated September 28, 2006 (Annexure P.6) by the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority to Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the averments made by the petitioners in the present petition, we find that the grievance made by the petitioners is wholly pre-mature. It is not in dispute that as of today, the land of the petitioners has not been acquired and no proceedings whatsoever have

been initiated for the aforesaid acquisition. In these circumstances, we find that the grievance made by the petitioners is wholly without any basis. However, as and when any process for acquisition of the land of the petitioners is initiated, then the petitioners would be at liberty to raise objections against the same and take such further proceedings as are available to them, in accordance with law.

Disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

December 5, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.