Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BAHADUR SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bahadur Singh v. State of Punjab - CRM-60506-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12404 (12 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 60506-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 29.11.2006

Bahadur Singh

.... PETITIONER

Versus

State of Punjab

..... RESPONDENT

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. J.S. Bedi, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab.

Petitioner Bahadur Singh has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in FIR No. 210 dated 10.7.2004 under Section 302, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Nawanshahr.

I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR.

During the investigation, it has been found that the petitioner was having illicit relations with Surinder Kaur wife of deceased Dr.

Harbhajan Singh. Statement of Husan Lal has also been recorded, who had overheard the petitioner and co-accused Surjit Ram talking about their illegal relations with Surinder Kaur and Amandeep Kaur, wife and daughter of the deceased Doctor saying that the Doctor was an hindrance in their illegal relations, therefore, by hiring criminals, they got murdered the Doctor and his children. Statement of Gurbax Singh before whom the petitioner made extra judicial confession has also been recorded. Even challan against the petitioner has been filed.

Keeping in view the allegations and the material collected against the petitioner during investigation, I do not find any ground to grant regular bail to the petitioner, though vide separate order of even date passed in Crl. Misc. No. 49177-M of 2006, while giving detailed reasons, investigation in the aforesaid FIR has been transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation.

Dismissed.

November 29, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.