Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAI SINGH versus ANJALI DIWAN & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jai Singh v. Anjali Diwan & Ors - COCP-922-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12430 (12 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P.No. 922 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 11.12.2006

Jai Singh .....Petitioner(s)

through

Mr.G.S.Grewal, Sr. Advocate with

Mr.H.S.Grewal, Advocate.

vs.

Anjali Diwan & others .....Respondent(s) through

Mr.Rajesh Bhatia, Advocate &

Mr.Sanjiv Sharma, Advocate for No.1.

Mr.Hawa Singh Hooda, Advocate

General, Haryana with

Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana for No.2

Mr.Adish Gupta, Advocate for Nos.3 & 4

***

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
***

SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)

Reply/affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. Respondent No.1 has already filed his affidavit.

After going through the contents of these affidavits, it appears that for the time being suitable action has been taken by the official respondents to stop unauthorized and illegal construction in different urban estates of Faridabad. However, besides the close and periodical monitoring by the District Administration, demolition of the unauthorized constructions, imposition of exemplary costs and fine/penalties and a public awareness campaign are some of the effective steps which will have to be undertaken by the respondents to ensure that no further illegal/unauthorized construction is carried out and those who have already succeeded in raising the same, are deprived of the enjoyment thereof in accordance with law.

With these observations and directions, this contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to get the same revived if he comes across that notwithstanding these directions, some illegal/unauthorized constructions are still taking place in the area concerned.

Rule discharged.

Let a copy of this order be handed over to learned Advocate General, Haryana for information and necessary compliance by the Authorities.

December 11, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.