Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S DAULAT RAM AND ANOTHER versus TARA CHAND AND ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/s Daulat Ram and Another v. Tara Chand and Ors - CR-11-2007 [2006] RD-P&H 12678 (15 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.R.No.11 of 2007

DATE OF ORDER: 8.1.2007

M/s Daulat Ram and Another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Tara Chand and Others

....Respondent(s)

CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*.

Present: Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate.

M.M. AGGARWAL,J

This is petition against order dated 14.12.2006 passed by Civil Judge(Junior Division), Rewari-cum-Rent Controller whereby request of the tenant i.e the present petitioners for framing additional issues was declined.

The additional issues to be framed were as follows: i) What is the rate of rent of the disputed property? OPP ii)Whether there is a relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties?OPP

The issues already framed are as under:

i) Whether there is sub-letting by the respondent No.1 to respondent No.2?OPA

ii)Whether the applicant requires the demised shop for his personal use and occupation?OPA

C.R.No.11 of 2007 #2#

iii) Whether the applicant has no locus standi to file the present suit?OPR

iv) Whether the application is not maintainable in the present form?OPR

v) Relief.

Rent Controller vide declining the prayer of the present petitioners had observed that issue No.1 already framed itself covered the additional issues, which are sought to be framed. It had also been observed that the evidence of the landlord is already over and then application was made by the tenant after he had availed of seven opportunities.

Counsel for the petitioners argues that it was the duty of the Court to frame proper issues. He has relied on judgments of this Court reported in Sher Singh v. General Public, 2001(3) RCR (Civil) 780 and Rajinder Tandon v. Thomas Nasir Masih, 1999(1) RCR (Civil) 539 and K.N. Palaniswamy v. P. Subramanian, Madras High Court, 2005(2) RCR (Civil) 224.

When a rent petition is filed, it will always be for the landlord to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. Rent Controller had itself observed that issue No.1 covers the additional issue as prayed.

I do not find any good ground to interfere.

Dismissed.

January 08, 2007 ( M.M. AGGARWAL )

manoj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.