High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Surinder Singh Rathee v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & ot - CWP-19834-2006  RD-P&H 12785 (18 December 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
* * * * *
C.W.P NO.19834 OF 2006
Date of decision : December 14, 2006
* * * * *
Surinder Singh Rathee ............Petitioner Vs.
Haryana Urban Development Authority & others ...........Respondents * * * * *
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA
Present: Mr. J.P Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
* * * * *
Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)
Notice of motion to the respondents.
On the asking of the Court, Sh. Ashok Jindal, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents
The petitioner claims himself to be an oustee and as such claims the allotment of the plot in the aforesaid category. It has been claimed by the petitioner that although an application has been filed by the petitioner for allotment of the plot under the oustees category and even a representation had been filed by him in the month of February 2006, but no action whatsoever has been taken so far by the competent authority.
On November 29, 2006, the Chief Administrator, HUDA had C.W.P NO.19834 OF 2006 2
appeared before us in connection with hearing of CWP No.15433 of 2006 and other connected matters and had made a detailed statement. On the basis of the statement made by the Chief Administrator, HUDA writ petitions were disposed of.
We dispose of the present writ petition in terms of order dated November 29, 2006 passed in CWP No.15433 of 2006.
Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.
( VINEY MITTAL )
December 14, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.