Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S JAGAN NATH SURESH KUMAR versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/s Jagan Nath Suresh Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-18508-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12985 (21 December 2006)

C.W.P NO.18508 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

* * * * *

C.W.P NO.18508 OF 2006

Date of decision : November 27, 2006

* * * * *

M/s Jagan Nath Suresh Kumar ............Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab & others ...........Respondents * * * * *

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA

Present: Mr. A.K Walia, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

* * * * *

Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of the Court, Sh. Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner-firm has approached this Court for issuance of directions to consider its claim for the allotment of a site in the New Anaj Mandi, Mansa. It has been claimed by the petitioner-firm that it is fully eligible for the said allotment.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into C.W.P NO.18508 OF 2006 2

consideration all the averments made in the present petition, but without commenting upon the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner-firm to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the Secretary, Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board-respondent no.2 within a period of 4 weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received by appending all the relevant documents. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner- firm, then the respondent no.2 shall take into consideration the same and take such appropriate action as may be required in accordance with law.

Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.

( VINEY MITTAL )

JUDGE

November 27, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )

ritu JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.