Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAHIL SEHGAL versus THE DIRECTOR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sahil Sehgal v. The Director-Principal, Sri Guru Ram Das - CWP-18635-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 12997 (21 December 2006)

C.W.P NO. 18635 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

* * * * *

C.W.P NO. 18635 OF 2006

Date of decision : November 27, 2006

* * * * *

Sahil Sehgal ............Petitioner

Vs.

The Director-Principal, Sri Guru Ram Das ...........Respondents Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar & another

* * * * *

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA

Present: Mr. S.K Pipat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

* * * * *

Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has challenged the order dated October 7, 2006 (Annexure P-3), whereby the petitioner has been ordered to be rusticated from the College on account of the alleged involvement in criminal activities.

Although, various pleas have been raised by the petitioner challenging the aforesaid occurrence and claiming that he was not involved in any manner in the aforesaid incidence and also that the orders of rustication had been passed by the authorities without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and without taking into consideration the actual pleas, however during the course of the arguments, Mr. S.K Pipat, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner says that since the petitioner has already filed a detailed and comprehensive C.W.P NO. 18635 OF 2006 2

representation Annexure P-4 before the Director-Principal, Shri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar and the aforesaid representation remains undecided so far, therefore, the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to the aforesaid respondent no.1 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation.

Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner but without commenting upon the merits of the claim made by him at all in the present petition, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Director-Principal, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Science & Research, Amritsar-respondent no.` to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation Annexure P-4 within a period of ten days from the date a certified copy of this order is received by passing a detailed and speaking order.

Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.

( VINEY MITTAL )

JUDGE

November 27, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )

ritu JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.