Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ACHHRA SINGH & ORS versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Achhra Singh & Ors v. State of Punjab and Ors - RFA-1441-2000 [2006] RD-P&H 1338 (2 March 2006)

R.F.A. No. 1441 of 2000 (O&M) [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

R.F.A. No. 1441 of 2000 (O&M)

Date of Decision: March 7, 2006

Achhra Singh and others

.....Appellants

Vs.

State of Punjab and Others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL.
Present:- Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Sushant Maini, Deputy

Advocate General, Punjab,

for the respondents.

-.-

VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in the application is to fix the case for final disposal since the same is covered by a judgment of this Court dated May 13, 2005 passed in R.F.A. NO. 737 of 2000 (Jaswant Kaur and others Vs. State of Punjab and another).

Notice of the application to the Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr. Sushant Maini, the learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice.

R.F.A. No. 1441 of 2000 (O&M) [2]

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has produced before me a copy of the judgment dated May 13, 2005, passed in R.F.A. NO. 737 of 2000 (Jaswant Kaur and others Vs. State of Punjab and another).

A perusal of the aforesaid judgment shows that the assessment of compensation in Jaswant Kaur's case (supra) was qua the land which had been acquired through a notification dated April 7, 1989. The perusal of the award of the reference Court in the present appeal also shows that the land in the present appeal has also been acquired through the aforesaid notification dated April 7, 1989.

Consequently, it is apparent that the controversy in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment in Jaswant Kaur's case (supra).

In these circumstances, the main appeal itself is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated May 13, 2005 passed in R.F.A. NO. 737 of 2000 (Jaswant Kaur and others Vs. State of Punjab and another).

C.M. as well as the main appeal stand disposed of.

March 7, 2006 (VINEY MITTAL)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.