High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Satya Pal v. Meenakshi Anand & Anr. - COCP-93-2006  RD-P&H 1496 (7 March 2006)
COCP No.93 of 2006
DATE OF DECISION:7.3.2006
Meenakshi Anand and another.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR,
Present:- Mr.S.K. Yadav,Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.Sudhir Makkar, Sr. DAG Haryana.
On 9.9.2005 while disposing of CWP No.14395 of 2005, a Division Bench of this Court had issued directions to the respondents for conveying necessary information to the Haryana Subordinate Selection Board within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of that order was supplied to respondents. In para 2 and 3 of the reply, the stand taken by respondent 2 i.e. J.P.L.
Srivastava, IFS, is that the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest vide its order dated 17.2.2006 had informed Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Chandigarh that requisition already sent to it vide this office letter No.1000 dated 16.7.2004 should not be deemed cancelled.
In view of the above, the order stands complied with. Rule is discharged.
March 7,2006 (M.M. KUMAR)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.